Restorative justice for perpetrators of corruption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i5.603Keywords:
Crime, Corruption, Restorative JusticeAbstract
The rise of criminal acts of corruption, which are mainly committed by government officials, is increasing so that the impact of corruption develops in society. The Indonesian government has received a lot of prejudice and calls in recent times to be serious in fighting corruption. Especially with the news that many law enforcement officers have committed corruption, heinous acts, extortion, and power. Some still believe that only repressive means can defeat corruption. Today's social, economic, and political conditions pave the way for massive, systematic, and structured corruption in various fields of life, including state institutions, government forums, and government forums. In finance and many other areas of civic life. The puzzle of this academic study is, "Why is the resolution of corruption cases in Indonesia not currently using restorative justice?" Anti-corruption is achieved through a comprehensive and systematic policy that aims to integrate anti-crime policies and comprehensive system development policies. Eradication of criminal acts of corruption is carried out through a comprehensive system policy that aims to integrate crime prevention strategies with a comprehensive system development strategy. Anti-corruption efforts are repressive and preventive, integrated and synergistic in nature because only repressive efforts are aimed at overcoming the characteristics and aspects of corruption whose effectiveness has not been tested. One of the basic objectives of eradicating corruption in Indonesia is to restore state loss. However, the paradigm of retributive justice is the legal basis for eradicating criminal acts of corruption and the punishment of corruptors is irrelevant to the main objective of the law on corruption eradication in Indonesia. What is actually important in the spirit of eradicating corruption is the recovery of state losses In fact, it is only an additional punishment that can also be replaced by imprisonment. This article is intended to examine the concept of sentencing perpetrators of corruption that is relevant to be applied in Indonesia according to what is required by law taking into account the development of life nation and state today. The study focuses on deepening the concept of restorative justice for maximizing returns on state finances in criminalizing corruption offenders in Indonesia. By using normative juridical research methods, this study concludes that the concept of restorative justice is the deep sentencing of perpetrators of corruption can be implemented in the form of strengthening norms of restitution of state losses as an additional punishment to the main punishment. As for anticipating that the perpetrator is unable to pay for the loss, then the concept of forced labor can be applied rather than imprison perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption).
Downloads
References
Agus Rusianto. 2015. Tindak Pidana & Pertanggung jawaban Pidana: Tinjauan Kritis Melalui Konsistensi antara Asas, Teori, dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Kencana.
Budi Suharianto, Restorative Justice dalam Pemidanaan Korporasi Pelaku Korupsi demi Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara, Jakarta, Kemenkum ham, Volume 5, Nomor3, Desember 2016.
Marlina. 2017. Pengantar Konsep Diversi danRestorative justice dalam Hukum Pidana. USUPress. Medan
DR. M. Hatta Ali, S.H., M. H. (2022). Peradilan sederhana cepat & biaya ringan menuju keadilan restoratif https://books.google.co.id/books?id=KbleEAAAQBAJ&dq=keadilan+restoratif&lr=&hl=id&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Erick, M., Amsori, E., Tinggi, S., & Hukum, I. (2022). Penyelesaian Perkara Anak di Indonesia Melalui Keadilan Restoratif ( Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor?: 8 / Pid . Sus-Anak / 2018 / PN Kng .). 6(3), 6505–6517.
Herman, Haris, O. K., Hidayat, S., Handrawan, Tatawu, G., & Nalle, D. F. (2022). Penghentian Penuntutan terhadap Penyalahguna Narkotika Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. 4(2), 322–341. https://journal.uho.ac.id/index.php/holresch/article/view/48/25
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2007). Restorative justice: What is it and does it work? Annual Review of Law https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110005
No, V., & Ahzar, R. M. (2022). Amnesti?: Jurnal Hukum Keadilan Restorative Justice sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Peradilan yang Humanis. 4(2), 109–119.
Nurman, W. M. (2022). Penerapan keadilan restoratif dalam penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik melalui media sosial (studi di polda sumatera utara).
Siregar, A. A. I., Susila, M. E., & Firmansyah, I. (2022). Keadilan Restoratif sebagai Upaya Penguatan Sistem Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Penyelundupan Pengungsi. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 29(3), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss3.art5
Budi Suharianto2016.Restorative Justice dalamPemidanaan Korporasi Pelaku Korupsi demiOptimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian KeuanganNegara, Jakarta, Kemenkumham, Volume 5, Nomor3, Desember
Hernold Ferry. 2017. Kerugian KeuanganNegaradalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yogyakarta: ThafaMedia
Agus Rusianto. 2018. Tindak Pidana & Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Tinjauan Kritis Melalui Konsistensi antara Asas, Teori, dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Kencana.
Muhammad Djafar Saidi. 2015. Hukum pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Teddy Lesmana,2019.“Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan PidanaIndonesia”, Tesis Pascasarjana Universitas Jambi,.
