Legal Certainty Aspects in Regulation of the Attorney General Number 15 of 2020 Concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice
Keywords:
Attorney, Legal Certainty, Prosecutor, Restorative JusticeAbstract
There have been many sharp criticisms regarding law enforcement by law enforcement officials where small cases that could be resolved through peaceful efforts ended up in court. In 2020, the Attorney General issued Prosecutor Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning termination of prosecution. It is necessary to pay attention to the legal certainty aspect of the regulation when it is implemented. This study aims to analyze the aspect of legal certainty in the Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning termination of prosecution based on restorative justice. Study this law uses a normative juridical approach Statutory Approach, the "statuta approach", and Conceptual Approach, the "conceptual approach". The results of the study concluded thatThe aspect of legal certainty lies in the guidelines that have been made by determining and limiting the requirements and implementation of termination of prosecution based on restorative justice. Service Regulation Number 15 of 2020 was made to support law enforcement with legal certainty, where restorative justice is given a clear, firm and comprehensive legal basis.
Downloads
References
Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum.
Anshar, R., & Setiyono, J. (2020). Tugas dan Fungsi Polisi Sebagai Penegak Hukum dalam Perspektif Pancasila. Ejournal2.Undip.Ac.Id. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jphi/article/view/8806
Asshiddiqie, J. (2022). Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi: Perspektif Baru tentang Rule of Law and Rule of Ethics & Constitutional Law and Constitutional Ethics (Edisi Revisi).
Bombing, Y. S., Muhammad, A., Pattenreng, A., & Hasan, Y. A. (2016). Penghentian Penuntutan Perkara Pidana Oleh Jaksa Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Pidana. Ejournal.Unsrat.Ac.Id. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/11360
Darman, A., & Mangku, D. (2021). PENOLAKAN PENGHENTIAN PENUNTUTAN BERDASARKAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE TERHADAP DUGAAN MODUS OPERANDI TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN. Ejournal.Undiksha.Ac.Id, 6(2). https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jatayu/article/view/45941
Huda, M. (2020). Hak Atas Memperoleh Kepastian Hukum Dalam Perspektif Persaingan Usaha Melalui Telaah Bukti Tidak Langsung. Pdfs.Semanticscholar.Org. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b0c4/4d230c01306e81cf56650dc978bc96f6fa40.pdf
Karmilia, R. (2022). PENERAPAN PRINSIP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DI TINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM. Journal Of Juridische Analyse, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.30606/JOJA.V1I2.1508
Kristanto, A. (2022). Kajian Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Lex Renaissance, 7(1), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.VOL7.ISS1.ART14
Laili, R., & Santoso, L. (2021). Analisis Penolakan Isbat Nikah Perspektif Studi Hukum Kritis. Ejournal.Insuriponorogo.Ac.Id. https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/almanhaj/article/view/566
Mantili, R. (2019). Tanggung Jawab Renteng Ganti Kerugian Immateriil Atas Perbuatan Melawan Dihubungkan Dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal.Fh.Unpad.Ac.Id. http://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/jbmh/article/view/67
Muhtar, M., Hadju, Z., & Abdussamad, Z. (2022). Perluasan Kewenangan Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Terhadap Pengawasan Media Digital. Jurnalkonstitusi.Mkri.Id. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1916
Muslih, M. (2017). Negara Hukum Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Gustav Radbruch (Tiga Nilai Dasar Hukum). Legalitas.Unbari.Ac.Id, 1. http://legalitas.unbari.ac.id/index.php/Legalitas/article/view/117
Pratama, Y. (2016). Kewenangan Presiden terhadap permohonan Grasi serta Penerap annya dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana. Ejournal.Unsrat.Ac.Id. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexetsocietatis/article/view/12623
Prayogo, R. (2016). Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Hak Uji Materiil Dan Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah. Download.Garuda.Kemdikbud.Go.Id. http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=949870&val=14663&title=PENERAPAN%20ASAS%20KEPASTIAN%20HUKUM%20DALAM%20%20PERATURAN%20MAHKAMAH%20AGUNG%20NOMOR%201%20TAHUN%202011%20TENTANG%20%20HAK%20UJI%20MATERIIL%20DAN%20DALAM%20%20PERATURAN%20MAHKAMAH%20KONSTITUSI%20NOMOR%2006PMK2005%20TENTANG%20%20PEDOMAN%20BERACARA%20DALAM%20PENGUJIAN%20UNDANG-UNDANG
Saputra, F., Kalo, S., & Mulyadi, M. (2014). Analisis Yuridis Penerbitan Surat Perintah Penghentian Penuntutan oleh Kejaksaan Dikaitkan dengan Asas Oportunitas dan Undang-undang No 16 Tahun. Download.Garuda.Kemdikbud.Go.Id, 1. http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=1423313&val=4099&title=ANALISIS%20YURIDIS%20PENERBITAN%20SURAT%20PERINTAH%20PENGHENTIAN%20PENUNTUTAN%20OLEH%20KEJAKSAAN%20DIKAITKAN%20DENGAN%20ASAS%20OPORTUNITAS%20DAN%20UNDANG-UNDANG%20NO%2016%20TAHUN%202004%20TENTANG%20KEJAKSAAN%20RI
Suhaimi, S. (2018). PROBLEM HUKUM DAN PENDEKATAN DALAM PENELITIAN HUKUM NORMATIF. Jurnal YUSTITIA, 19(2). http://ejournal.unira.ac.id/index.php/yustitia/article/view/477
Sutrisno, S., Puluhulawa, F., & Tijow, L. (2020). Penerapan Asas Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Putusan Hakim Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal.Unigo.Ac.Id. https://jurnal.unigo.ac.id/index.php/golrev/article/view/987
Tomalili, R. (2019). Hukum Pidana. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=t9-NDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Menentukan+tindakan+mana+yang+tidak+boleh+dilakukan,+yang+dilarang,+disertai+dengan+ancaman+atau+sanksi+dalam+bentuk+hukuman+tertentu+bagi+siapa+saja+yang+melanggar+larangan+tersebut&ots=exRsiKtA5c&sig=t2s2wVA7cchHqB24s-xfD2sG07o
Wantu, F. (2013). Kendala Hakim Dalam Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, dan Kemanfaatan di Peradilan Perdata. Journal.Ugm.Ac.Id. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/16092
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2022-12-25 (2)
- 2022-12-25 (1)
