Agricultural Land Punching Problems Under The Hands Customically (Cinta Maju Village Study, Samosir Regency)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i5.734Keywords:
Farmland, Pawn custom, ProblemsAbstract
This study aims to find out about the customary pawning of agricultural land in the village of Cinta Maju, Samosir Regency.The pawning of land that occurred in the village was a legal act long ago, so land pawning that is tens of years old is still found, with the object of pawning agricultural land and agricultural land. The binding of the land pledge was made on a stamp letter a long time ago and there is a letter affixed with a stamp made by the pawning parties with witnesses being local elders/traditional elders. The legal rules regarding land pawn agreements that occur in the community must follow the rules of customary law. This study analyzes data qualitatively. The method of approach to this research is normative. Source of data used secondary data. Data collection tools used with documentation studies. Location in Samosir Regency, Sitiotio sub-district, Cinta Maju Village. The village's customary rules still demand repayment of new debts to release their lien rights, because of the importance of awareness from the community itself about debts that must be paid, in the law it is termed "Pacta Sun Servanda". The indigenous people of the village of Cinta Maju are still pawning agricultural land in a customary way, and the old mortgage on agricultural land that has not been repaid is still valid, excluding the provisions of Article 7 paragraph 1 of UU Prp No. 56 of 1960..
Downloads
References
Aini, I. (2020). Analysis of the Implementation of Agricultural Land Pawn Based on Law no. 56 Prp of 1960 Concerning Determination of Agricultural Land Area (Case Study in Simpang Tonang District, Dua Koto District, Pasaman). Yurisprudentia: Journal of Economic Law, 6(1), 97. https://unars.ac.id/ojs/index.php/fenomena/article/view/863
Annisa Reski Syamsuri, Sohrah, N. (2020). Pawning Agricultural Land According to Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Concerning Determination of Agricultural Land Areas. Iqtishaduna, 1(3), 156–164.
Cornelis Van Vollenhoven. (2013). Indonesians and their Land (Upik Djalins and Anna Mariana (ed.)). Sajogyo Institute, HuMa Association, STPN Press, Beta Motherland. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results
Mr B. Ter Haar Bzn. (1960). The Principles and Structure of Customary Law (K. N g Soebakti Poesponoto (ed.)). Pradnja Paramita. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results
Muhaimin. (2020). Legal Research Methods (Team of Mataram University Press (ed.)). Mataram UniversityPress. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results
Purnama, AS, Makkawaru, Z., & Tira, A. (2020). Juridical Analysis of Land Pawn Agreement According to Law Number. 56/PRP/1960 in Parasangang Beru Village, Turatea District, Jeneponto Regency. Clavia: Journal of Law, 18(1), 67–74.
Putra, AA, Rahayu Subekti, & Purwono Sungkowo Raharjo. (2022). Analysis of the Implementation of Agricultural Land Pawn According to Law Number 56 Prp of 1960 (Study in Ponorogo Regency). Journal of Legal Communications, Vol. 8(2), 243–250.
Septarina Budiwati. (2019). The Principles of Pacta Sunt Servanda And Their Binding Power In A Transcendent Perspective Business Contract. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Transcendental Law, 41.
Umar, M., Sutiarnoto, & Leviza, J. (2022). Juridical Analysis of the Elimination of Land Pawn Debt Based on PERPPU Number 56 of 1960 concerning Pawning of Agricultural Land. Journal of Law and Society Al-Hikmah, 3(1), 1–26.
Santoso. Urip., (2007) Agrarian Law and Land Rights. Jakarta: Pranada Media in Umar, M., Sutiarnoto, & Leviza, J. (2022). Juridical Analysis of the Elimination of Land Pawn Debt Based on PERPPU Number 56 of 1960 concerning Pawning of Agricultural Land. Journal of Law and Society Al-Hikmah, 3(1), 1–26.
