Termination of Criminal Investigations by The Prosecutor Under Criminal Law
Keywords:
Prosecution, Case, Criminal ProcedureAbstract
One of the functions of a sovereign state of law is to be able to properly administer each judicial process and realize it in a very broad scope of society. This study uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach and data triangulation analysis, the results of the study explain that each country has its own way of completing each judicial decision as well as Indonesia as a country that is very obedient and obedient to applicable laws, the Indonesian people highly respect every judicial process that is carried out. issued through the prosecutor's decision, while the mechanism for terminating the decision of the prosecution of cases carried out by the attorney general is a special authority regulated through a law and has certain reasons for each decision making, as for several reasons that serve as a reference for prosecutors in implementing The judicial process includes cases that do not have strong enough evidence to be involved in a trial process, then the case has passed the time limit determined by the trial and lastly The case is closed for a legal interest, the purposes of the interests contained in the Act have a broad meaning and one of them concerns the interests of the state and society at large.
Downloads
References
Abdulah, H. (2018). Separate Filing (Splitsing) In Criminal Case Management. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(2), 461-460.
Achmad, W. RW (2021). Conflict Resolution of Remote Indigenous Communities (Overview of The Sociology Communication). LEGAL BRIEF, 10(2), 280-286.
Afriani, N. (2021). PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN DAN PENUNTUTAN TINDAK PIDANA POLIGAMI TANPA IZIN (SUATU PENELITIAN DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN NEGERI JANTHO). ETD Unsyiah.
Atila, T., & Din, M. (2019). Penghentian Penyidikan Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Mengalami Gangguan Jiwa Pada Polresta Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana, 3(4), 747-754.
Bimantara, B., Somawijaya, S., &Imamulhadi, I. (2021). PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP MELALUI PENERAPAN ASAS ULTIMUM REMEDIUM DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 32 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN DAN PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 2(2), 366-381.
Hartono, M. R. (2020). Analisis terhadap Penghentian Penyidikan pada Laporan Polisi Nomor: B. 210/VIII/2018/JAMBI/SPKT” C” Tentang Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan Anak. Wajah Hukum, 4(2), 341-349.
Indarsih, Y. (2021). Some of The Legal Implications Procedure Regulation no. 15 of 2020 Concerning Stopping Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. LEGAL BRIEF, 10(2), 157-178.
Negara, G. (2020). Penyidikan Kembali Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Telah Dihentikan Penyidikannya Oleh Kejaksaan Berdasarkan Ditemukannya Alat Bukti Baru. Jurnal Pahlawan, 3(2), 7-18.
Nelson, F. M., & Santoso, T. (2020). Plea Bargaining in Corruption Cases: A Solution for the Recovery of Financial Losses by Indonesia?.Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(2).
Pahlevi, R. (2021). BATAS WAKTU PENETAPAN SP3 (SURAT PERINTAH PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN) TERKAIT KEWENANGAN KEPOLISIAN PADA PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. NOVUM: JURNAL HUKUM, 161-170.
Pasalli, J. R. (2020). ALASAN PENGHENTIAN PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 31 TAHUN 1999. LEX CRIMEN, 9(4).
Polontalo, R. S. D. (2018). Independensi Jaksa Sebagai Penuntut Umum dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 7(6).
Putri, R. V., & Saini, Y. (2014). GENERAL AUTHORITY REMOVED AS PROSECUTOR IN TERMINATION PROVISIONS LETTER PROSECUTION (SKPP) CRIME AGAINST CORRUPTION CASE (CASE STUDY NUMBER TAP 01.14/Ft. 1/12/2009 and NumberTAP 02.14/Ft. 1/12/2009). Abstract of Undergraduate Research, Faculty of Law, Bung Hatta University, 4(1).
Rendra, G. (2019). Kewenangan Penuntut Umum Dalam Penyidikan Perkara Pencegahan Pemberantasan Perusakan Hutan (P3H). JurnalYuridis, 6(2), 157.
Resmini, W., &Taufikurahman, T. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Pertimbangan Hukum Penghentian Penyidikan Terhadap Tindak Pidana dan Akibat Hukumnya (Studi Kasus di Polres Kota Bima). CIVICUS: Pendidikan-Penelitian-Pengabdian Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 25-37.
Resmini, W., &Taufikurahman, T. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Pertimbangan Hukum Penghentian Penyidikan Terhadap Tindak Pidana dan Akibat Hukumnya (Studi Kasus di Polres Kota Bima). CIVICUS: Pendidikan-Penelitian-Pengabdian Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 25-37.
Rumondor, S. S. (2017). Penghentian Penyidikan Dalam Proses Perkara Pidana. Lex Privatum, 5(2).
Rusdi, R., Mulyadi, M., &Afan, I. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Penghentian Penyidikan terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditreskrimsus Polda Sumatera Utara. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 2(3), 720-734.
Saputra, F., Kalo, S., Mulyadi, M., & Hamdan, M. (2014). Analisis Yuridis Penerbitan Surat Perintah Penghentian Penuntutan oleh Kejaksaan Dikaitkan dengan Asas Oportunitas dan Undang-undang No 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan RI. USU Law Journal, 2(1), 105-123.
Suparman, E. (2017). Judicial Corruption Between Community Legal Culture And Government Administrative Legal Violence. Legal Standing: JurnalIlmu Hukum, 1(2), 1-17.
Wahyuningsih, S. E., &Sunaryo, A. (2017). The Role of Prosecutor Office In The Eradication Of Corruption Criminal Acts in Indonesia. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 4(2), 244-254.
Wallad, A. A. F. (2020). The Difference in Meaning for the Dismissal of Charges, Postponement of Charges and Waiver of Dispute. Yuridika, 35(2), 211-230.
Wullur, H. H. (2015). PerananJaksa Terhadap Penanganan Tindak Pidana Menurut Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana (Kuhap). Lex Crimen, 4(2).
