Rejection of Cassation Application by The Supreme Judge Because The De-fendant Was Not Legally Proven To Have Committed A Criminal Act (Study Of Supreme Court Decision Number 2205k/Pid.Sus/2022)

Authors

  • Muhammad Riski Habibi NST Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Budi Sastra Panjaitan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i6.1212

Keywords:

Rejection of Application, Cassation, Not Proven

Abstract

 The Supreme Court is the pinnacle of (legal) efforts in seeking justice through the judicial process, both as a cassation court and a court for judicial review. The Supreme Court in carrying out its judicial function does not always meet the expectations of justice seekers in particular, and the public in general. The method used in this writing is the normative legal approach method where the research conducted is by examining existing library materials (library research), which are related to the title being studied. The results of this study indicate that the Supreme Court's Cassation Decision No. 2205 K/Pid.Sus/2022, stated that it rejected the cassation from the Cassation Applicant/Public Prosecutor to the Corruption Eradication Commission, with the consideration that the Cassation Applicant/Public Prosecutor could not prove that the judex facti decision did not meet the provisions of Article 253 paragraph (1) letters a, b, c of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law. The Public Prosecutor at the KPK filed an appeal in case number 2205k/Pid.Sus/2022, namely that 1) the reason for the Public Prosecutor's appeal was because the judex facti (District Court) was wrong in applying the law, the judex facti had tried the Defendant in the a quo case not in accordance with the applicable criminal procedure law, and the judex facti did not exceed its authority, 2) That the reason for the Public Prosecutor's appeal was basically regarding the judex facti not applying the law or applying the law improperly because the judex facti stated that the Defendant was proven to have committed a crime as charged by the Public Prosecutor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adiyaryani, N. N. (2010). Upaya Hukum Kasasi oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum Terhadap Putusan Bebas (Vrijspraak) dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO.

Amal, A. A. F. (n.d.). TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA OLEH IBU KANDUNG TERHADAP ANAK KANDUNG DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA POSITIF DAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM ANALISIS STUDI PUTUSAN NO. 265/Pid. B/2015/PN. Cms. Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Ardelia, I. G., & Rustamaji, M. (2023). Ratio Decidendi Mahkamah Agung Membatalkan Putusan Judex Factie dan Mengadili Sendiri dalam Perkara Narkotika. Jurnal Verstek, 11(2).

Ardhan, F. (2020). Alasan Penghapus Pidana Bagi Pembeli Yang Membeli Barang Hasil Kejahatan Dikaitkan Dengan Pasal 480 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS PASUNDAN.

Arief, M. I. (2021). Pertimbangan Yuridis Putusan Bebas & Upaya Hukum Kasasi Perkara Pidana. MCL Publisher.

ATMAJA, R. I. (n.d.). PERMOHONAN KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM DAN TERDAKWA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA MENGGUNAKAN SURAT PALSU ATAU DIPALSUKAN (PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG RI NOMOR 22/K. PID/2014).

Basri, H. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 104–121.

Berliana, M., Milono, Y. K., & Prihatini, L. (n.d.). PERBEDAAN PENDAPAT HAKIM (DISSENTING OPINION) TERHADAP PUTUSAN LEPAS DARI SEGALA TUNTUTAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI BANTUAN LIKUIDITAS BANK INDONESIA.

Hamzah, J. A. (2024). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Beberapa Negara (Edisi Ketiga). Sinar Grafika.

Hanin, A., & SH, ?. ?. (2024). UPAYA HUKUM DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA. Perkembangan Terbaru Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, 126.

Hukum, T., Indonesia, D., Dari, D., Kelsenian, D., & Kurniawan, A. (2024). Pemikiran Mahfud Md Terkait Politik Hukum Dan Penerapan, 4(5), 1610–1617.

Korua, R. V. (2020). Kajian Hukum Putusan Bebas (Vrijspraak) dalam Perkara Pidana. Lex Crimen, 9(4).

Muhtar, M. H., Tribakti, I., Salim, A., Tuhumury, H. A., Ubaidillah, M. H., Imran, S. Y., … Amin, F. (2023). Konsep Hukum Indonesia. Global Eksekutif Teknologi, 35.

Musa, F. D., Thalib, H., & Yunus, A. (2021). Efektivitas Upaya Hukum Kasasi Jaksa Penuntut Umum Terhadap Putus Bebas Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 2(2), 290–305.

NATSIR, M. (2024). FORMULASI PEMIDANAAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA MANIPULASI DOKUMEN ELEKTRONIK BERBASIS KEADILAN (Studi Kasus: Putusan PN Pangkalan Bun, No. 134/Pid. Sus/2023/PN. Pbu). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.

Panjaitan, Budi Sastra, Lingkungan, H., Tlndak, M., Problem, M., Hukum, F., & Sebffiai, U. (2018). budi sastra panjaitan. Keadilan, 5.

Ristiana, I. (2016). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Bebas (Vrijspraak) Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 576/Pid. B/2010/PN. Mks). Universitas Hasanuddin.

Rizal, M. C. (2021). Diktat Hukum Acara Pidana. Buku Lembaga Studi Hukum Pidana, 380746.

ROHANIAH, R. (2020). DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN KENDARAAN BERMOTOR RODA DUA DI WILAYAH HUKUM PENGADILAN TINGGI JAMBI (STUDI KASUS DI BEBERAPA PENGADILAN NEGERI). Universitas Batanghari.

Santos, M. F. (2021). KAJIAN HUKUM EKSEPSI ATAS DAKWAAN JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM MENURUT KETENTUAN PASAL 156 AYAT (1) UNDANG UNDANG NO. 8 TAHUN 1981. Lex Crimen, 10(6).

Sumaryanto, A. D., & SH, M. H. (2019). Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana. Jakad Media Publishing.

Waluyo, B. (2022). Penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Wijaya, N. W. (2020). Pengajuan Kasasi Penuntut Umum Terhadap Putusan Bebas Oleh Judex Facti Dan Pertimbangan Judex Juris Memutus Perkara Narkotika. Jurnal Verstek, 8.

Zaidan, M. A. (2022). Menuju pembaruan hukum pidana. Sinar Grafika.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-04

How to Cite

Habibi NST, M. R., & Panjaitan, B. S. (2025). Rejection of Cassation Application by The Supreme Judge Because The De-fendant Was Not Legally Proven To Have Committed A Criminal Act (Study Of Supreme Court Decision Number 2205k/Pid.Sus/2022). LEGAL BRIEF, 13(6), 1501–1512. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i6.1212

Issue

Section

National and International Civil Law, State Administration and Commercial Law