Juridical analysis of user consumer protection health services (case study of Tiara Debora Simanjorang's death in hospital Kalideres family partner)
Keywords:
Consumer, Protection Law, Health ServicesAbstract
Hospitals providing their services must pay attention to the quality of their services to patients as consumers. A large number of demands and lawsuits from patients to the hospital is clear evidence that there are still many patients who are dissatisfied with the services provided by the hospital. The problem that arises in the health services provided by the Kalideres Family Partner Hospital to Debora is the provision of services that are not optimal, causing losses to patients. The main problems in this study are 1) Whether there is a violation of consumer rights, and 2) How consumers can take efforts for the losses experienced. To answer the subject matter, normative research is carried out, data processing is carried out qualitatively, concluding using a deductive mindset. The conclusion of the study is 1) Violations of consumer rights occur due to the obligations of the Hospital as a service provider that are not done properly, namely not providing services to Debora safely, properly, and without discrimination, and 2) The efforts that can be taken by consumers based on applicable laws and regulations are through peace agreements, through the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency and the courts.
Downloads
References
Ahmadi Miru. (2011). Prinsip-Prinsip Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen di Indonesia . Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada,.
Bahder Johan Nasution. (2005). Hukum Kesehatan Pertanggungjawaban Dokter . Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Celina Tri Siwi Kristiyanti. (2014). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen . Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Kasus Bayi Debora, Menkes Jatuhi Sanksi Tertulis untuk RS Mitra Keluarga Artikel ini telah tayang di Kompas.com dengan judul "Kasus Bayi Debora, Menkes Jatuhi Sanksi Tertulis untuk RS Mitra Keluarga. (2017).
maria. (2020). Sengketa Konsumen, ke Mana Mesti Mengadu?
Muskibah. (2010). Analisis Mengenai Cara Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen. Media Neliti: Lingkungan Hidup, Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan, Hukum Islam , 141–150.
Rachmad Usman. (2012). MEDIASI DI PENGADILAN Dalam Teori dan Praktik (1st ed.). Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.
Rifqani Nur Fauziah Hanif. (2020). Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
Soerjono Soekanto, & Sri Mahmudji. (2002). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Soerjono Soekanto, & Sri Mahmudji. (2003). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tami Rusli. (2012). Penyelesaian Sengketa Antara Konsumen Dan Pelaku Usaha Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Keadilan Progresif: Universitas Bandar Lampung, 3(1).
Tri Jata Ayu Pramesti. (2014). Sanksi Bagi Rumah Sakit yang Menolak Memberikan Tindakan Medis.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, Pasal 4 huruf a dan g.
Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran, Pasal 52 huruf c.
Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 2009 tentang Rumah Sakit, Pasal 32 huruf c, d dan e.

